“Nay! We hurl Truth against falsehood, so that it smashes its head, and lo it vanishes; and woe to you for what you describe.” Qur’an 21:18
The genteel rantings of right-wing author Douglas Murray with regard to the presence of immigrants, their descendants and the increasing visibility of the Islamic religion in the West have achieved wide currency and established him as one of the leading international celebrity intellectuals for every shade of western white supremacist and bigot. Of course, the essence of his rantings is far from novel. No informed person living in the West could be so removed to note that Murray’s central thesis is an extrapolation of the proposition, that a specific minority population poses a threat to a given western nation. Therefore, the solution is, said minority needs to be challenged, confronted, presence curtailed in the given nation if the West is to survive!
Murray’s fulminations culminated in his bestselling book, The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity and Islam. According to Murray, the principal driving force behind the ‘strange death of Europe’ is the policy of the German state during the leadership of Angela Merkal to allow migrants fleeing war into the European Union. Specifically, Merkal’s announcement in late August 2015 to allow a million refugees from war torn Syria and elsewhere into Europe proved to be the turning point and the bullhorn for all and sundry from the Global South to charge forth towards the European continent. Hence, the one way flow of migrants will, lo and behold, lead to Europe’s ‘strange death’.
Adrift at Sea
Yet even before August 2015, Murray acknowledges that more people were landing on the Italian island of Lampedusa in the Mediterranean on their way to Europe because in “part this was because of the number of people fleeing changes of government and civil unrest.” He then alludes to another issue and observes the “first year of the Arab Spring was an especially bad time for the island.” The ‘Arab Spring’ in the 2010s witnessed the revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt. In 2011, NATO at the behest of then British leader David Cameron and French leader Nicolas Sarkozi assisted supposed ‘moderate rebels’ in Libya to overthrow not only the then Ghadhaffi government but literally destroy the Libyan state. It is no surprise then to non-ideological people that according to Murray in 2014, “…the year before the migrant crises ‘began’ – 170,000 people arrived [in Lampedusa, Malta or Sicily]. Officials talk of solving the problem by filling Libya’s recent government vacuum”. As expected Murray doesn’t discuss how “Libya’s recent government vacuum” arose. This is understandable as Murray has written a book endorsing neo-conservate military interventionism, the ideology which underpinned the wars on Afghanistan and Iraq. It is simply not in his interest to state the obvious, that a foreign policy he had advocated – regime change – resulted in the beginning of the migration crisis across the Mediterranean Sea and into Europe. As George Orwell would say, the NATO Libyan military intervention is ‘memory-holed’, that is not spoken of anymore and especially the migratory consequences of that specific intervention.
Unsurprisingly Murray isn’t the only one to ignore, conceal the truth or memory hole the British led campaign for the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation’s (NATO) regime change war on Libya in 2011. Others who have de-emphasised or totally ignored the consequences of the Libya NATO military intervention are ironically on the face of it, those who claim to oppose Murray such as the British Muslim news website, 5Pillars which is a “Muslim community media platform” that “concentrates on British Muslim news but also looks to the wider Islamic world” and the Cage advocacy group which is an “organisation that aspires to a just world”.
Moazzam Begg one of the founders and directors Cage, in an interview with one of the editors of 5Pillars, Dilly Hussain on the official podcast of the latter “Blood Brothers” shared his thoughts about the regime change war on Syria in the 2010s and in doing so, he opined on the regime change war in Libya in 2011. This essay critically analyses how views on the Libya regime change war in this interview dovetails with the stance of the Zionist Douglas Murray. Begg himself establishes there is a link between the Libyan and Syrian regime change wars. As he says:
“Interestingly many of the people who had started the revolution in Libya and taken part in it militarily had some experience actually went on to set up and support some of the first resistance movements in Syria. So these very Libyans had gone from Libya and joined and fought…with this Free Syrian Army.”
Anyone paying attention to the 2010s regime change wars should immediately note there is nothing interesting about this. To express it bluntly, it was simply a case of NATO moving its unofficial foot soldiers or Muslim mercenaries from one arena of conflict to another to implement regime change. According to a Daily Telegraph report, in the month after Colonel Ghadhaffi was lynched by NATO’s Libyan “moderate rebels” in the Libyan city of Sirte in October 2011, a leading player in NATO’s war, Abd al-Hakim Belhaj travelled to the Syrian-Turkish border to meet so-called leaders from the Free Syrian Army. Dividends from this journey seemed to have payed off in early 2012 with the formation of a jihadist group called Kataib al-Muhajireen, which according to the Syrian regime change propagandist and Zionist, Charles Lister in his book, The Syrian Jihad, was “initially dominated by Libyans who had travelled to Syria after the fall of” Colonel Muammar Ghadhaffi. This group was eventually led by the Chechen, Omar al-Shishani. Another Libyan led fighting group called Liwa al-Ummah was formed in May 2012 by Belhaj’s right hand man, Mahdi al-Harati. The legendry investigative journalist, Seymour Hersh also wrote an article in early 2014 about this aspect of the Libyan-Syrian conveyor belt titled, The Red Line and the Rat Line. He argued that weapons were supplied from Libya’s arsenal after the fall of the Ghadhaffi government into Syria. According to Hersh, the Rat Line was, “authorised in early 2012, [and] was used to funnel weapons and ammunition from Libya via southern Turkey and across the Syrian border to the opposition.” Hersh relates a “highly classified annex” to an American report that describes
“a secret agreement reached in early 2012 between the Obama and Erdoğan administrations. It pertained to the rat line. By the terms of the agreement, funding came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar; the CIA, with the support of [Britain’s] MI6, was responsible for getting arms from Gaddafi’s arsenals into Syria.”
The human fallout from Cameron’s Libya intervention was nothing short of catastrophic with millions leaving the once richest country in Africa. Before the NATO intervention, Libya was a point of destination for millions of African migrant workers. The figures are not definite, but this author’s trips to Tunisia, I was informed that at least 900,000 Tunisians were then working in Libya. Other nationals working in Libya before the NATO intervention included up to 1.5 million Egyptians, roughly 1.5 million from black Africa and many more. More so, the NATO intervention then compelled millions of Libyans to flee their country and internally displaced hundreds of thousands of others. The French newspaper Le Monde reported that as of 2014, there were between 600,000 and 1 million Libyan refugees in Tunisia. Obviously, millions of Africans either went back to their countries of origin or made the perilous journey across the Mediterranean into Europe. The war on Libya shattered the lives of millions of people, predominately Muslims. What’s always far from being discussed is a very real hypothetical scenario: imagine there 4 million migrant workers in Libya and each one is supporting, on average four family members back in their country of origin with remittances. That potentially makes 12 million people whose financial well-being was uprooted by the NATO intervention. This is totally lost on Murray, Begg and Dilly. For this unholy trio, the millions of Africans and Arabs who were earning a living in Libya count for nothing. They are written out of history. Begg and Dilly as Asian Muslims don’t seem to recognise them as equals, while Murray simply bemoans that some led the early migration wave from the Global South to Europe.
Collusion or Partnership?
Additionally, one of the most glaring yet historically unsurprising features of the NATO war on Libya was that it once again brought western imperialism, led by the United States, Britain and France, back into bed with jihadist fighters. This relationship had reached a zenith during the Afghanistan war in the 1980s when the United States and Britain supported so-called ‘Mujahideen’ [CIA backed mercenaries] harvested from around the Muslim world to fight against the Soviet Union military intervention in Afghanistan. As Begg informs Dilly in the interview, “there was another war that happened not too long ago where the Soviets came in on the side of…a government that the United States didn’t like and an ordinary people that fought…against that government and that was Afghanistan during the Soviet occupation.” For the historically conscious, Begg is simplifying a general strategy employed by western imperialism during this period, specifically, the West supported Islamic political trends in order to undermine and destabilise governments in Muslim majority countries the West “didn’t like”, usually left leaning states.
Begg further elaborates, “There the Americans supplied for example stinger anti-aircraft missile systems to the Mujahideen which became a game changer… but at least you know they [Americans] were supporting against a Cold War.” Begg can be seen to be confirming that during the Cold War [1947-1991] between the United States led West and the Soviet Union, the United States and Britain supported Islamic movements to undermine Third World nationalist governments. The latter governments aimed to loosen the exploitative economic ties to the global capitalist system and one of the ways they did this was by throwing out western multinationals and nationalising the resources of their countries. Colonel Muammar al-Ghadhaffi, the former leader of Libya, on the other hand, was a third world nationalist who not only nationalised Libya’s oil industry after he overthrew the British puppet leader King Idries in 1969, he had also supported Third World movements which aimed to unshackle themselves from the western imperialist global financial system and dependency. A speech made by Ghadhaffi just two years before the NATO led regime change encapsulates part of Ghadhaffi’s economic thinking and why the West, especially Britain, had longed to remove him from ruling Libya:
“Have you heard of Pepsi Cola…Have you heard of Coca Cola…Whenever I ask you about Pepsi Cola or Coca Cola, people immediately say it’s an American or European drink. This is not true. The Cola is African. They have taken the cheap raw material from us, they produce it, they made it into a drink, and they sell it to us for a high price.
Why are Pepsi Coal and Coca Cola expensive? Because they have taken our cola, produced it, and sold it back to us. We should it produce ourselves and sell it to them.”
Although Ghadhaffi is specifically talking about a soda drink which many may consider trivial what is important here is that Ghadhaffi is trying to raise people’s political awareness and bring them out of political ignorance. He is arguing the natural resources of Africa should predominately be for the benefit of Africans and not western multinationals. He’s arguing that Africa is being robbed from two directions. Firstly, its natural resources are sold for a cheap price and secondly, western multinationals sell back to Africa products based on these resources at an expensive price. It’s a lose-lose exchange for Africa and a win-win exchange for the West. On this basis, Ghadhaffi made sure that the average Libyan benefitted from Libya’s oil wealth. According to Professor Maximilian Forte’s book Slouching Towards Sirte: NATO’s War on Libya and Africa, under Ghadhaffi life expectancy increased from 51 to 74, literacy to 95% for men and 78% for women and per capita income increased to $16,300. Homelessness was wiped out and there was massive improvements in medical care and education. As such, under Ghadhaffi, according “to the United Nations Development Program, Libya was the only continental African nation to rank “high” in the UNDP’s Human Development Index.” Libyan’s had enjoyed a considerable and relatively high quality of life. The Great Man Made River was built which transferred clean water from the southern regions of the country to the populated northern coastal regions for domestic, agricultural and industrial use. And of course, during this supposed “revolution” in 2011, NATO and its jihadi henchman tools took liberties to bomb and sabotage this amazing engineering project aimed at giving the Libyan people self-reliance and dignity. Ghadhaffi had also longed campaigned for independent African financial political institutions which would allow Africans to maximise leverage over Africa’s resources and cease to be exploited by western leaders and their corporations. As such Ghadhaffi, took a lead in initiating plans to set up an African Central Bank, African Monetary Fund and an African Court of Justice. Ghadhaffi was also central in establishing an African satellite which would circumvent African states being exploited by western communication companies.
Ghadhaffi’s economic policies, especially his contribution to make Africa less dependent on the West is alien to Begg, Dilly and Murry. Seven years after the overthrow of Ghadhaffi, British multinationals such as BP and Shell were back in Libya winning big oil business contracts.
Is Collusion in the Blood?
It was partly Ghadhaffi’s economic independence policies that had originally compelled British intelligence to collaborate with an al-Qaeda de facto franchise, Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) in the mid-1990s to assassinate the Libyan leader. Specifically, British intelligence hopped into bed with a certain ‘Abu Abdullah Sadiq’ to assassinate Ghadhaffi. The assassination was to be complemented by an orchestrated uprisings in Libyan cities with “limited contact” to former Libyan ‘Mujahideen’ veterans from the Afghanistan war of the 1980s. This British imperialist assassination attempt and plot failed but it eerily chimes with what materialised in February 2011 but this time using the cover of the “Arab Spring” as obfuscation and justification. Needless to say the British backed operative to assassinate Ghadhaffi in the 1990s, so-called Abu Abdullah al-Sadiq was the alias for the later re-emerged and re-energised Abd al-Hakim Belhaj who successfully led the Libyan “moderate rebels” forces that overran Tripoli under NATO air cover in August 2011.
A year after the NATO led destruction of Libya, one of NATO’s leaders, the Turkish president, Recep Erdogan, visited the war torn country and according to Begg, rallied the gathering of pious pawns thus:
“…he’s saying you are the sons,… the descendants of Omar Mukhtar, the great mujahid who fought against the…Italians [colonialism]. And he said today Libya and tomorrow Syria and he shouts, Syria, Syria and everybody’s going Syria, Syria, Syria. That so clearly he’s supporting…the regime change, that people need to rise up to do in in Syria, what they did in Libya. So that was an expectation and the people did so as a partly because they felt that the powerful NATO neighbour is in support of us…”
As can be seen from the recording, Begg keeps a straight face as he relayed this anecdote. What’s completely shocking and blinkered about this segment and seems totally lost on Begg and Dilly is that the great hero Libyan hero, Omar Mukhtar was fighting against the political ancestors of the very forces that had destabilised and destroyed Libya in 2011. In effect, Erdogan is laundering the Libyan collaborators with NATO as the descendants of the very people who fought NATO’s fore bearers, that is the European colonialists. This is clearly history shamelessly turned on its head.
This leads to another important issue and that is the connection between historical and contemporary Muslim military collusion with western imperialism and occupation. Both Dilly and Begg have interesting political backgrounds. Dilly is on record that he’s family background in Bangladesh is that of Rozakars, that is the Bangladeshi traitors who colluded with the pro-western Pakistani army during Bangladesh’s war of liberation to crush the resistance to Pakistani occupation and oppression. On the other hand, Begg in his autobiography offers an interesting family background. He states that his,
“…ancestors had been officers in the British Army…my grandfather and his father and grandfather had seen action in the Indian Mutiny (though I don’t know on which side), the Boer War, and the World Wars. One of my father’s uncles had been a POW in Europe, while another was killed fighting bandits near the Afghan border. We had a very strong military tradition as a family…”
This paragraph needs to be critically unpacked to establish a real possibility of a connection between historical and contemporary Muslim collusion with the West. From one perspective this is certainly a “strong military tradition”, but if we drill in further and had his ancestors fought on the honourable and right side of history during India’s India’s first war of independence (“Indian Mutiny”) in 1857 does anyone think that Begg, would ever stop reminding people of this noble background? As this author has discussed elsewhere the categorisation, “Indian Mutiny” is aimed at militarily localising and belittling the revolt against British rule in the 1850s with a view to falsely distance it from the general masses who predominately supported and participated in the Indian revolutionary uprising.
Begg also informs that his family served as part of the British auxiliary forces in South Africa, that is presumably the “Boer War” and the two World Wars. Indian leaders had wanted nothing to do with the internecine imperialist wars of Europeans such as World War Two which compels one to ask what “action” did the Begg family see during World War Two? Finally, Begg treats his readers to an old black and white photograph of his grandfather, Abdus-Sattar Begg, alongside his brothers in full British Raj military garb. Begg claims one of his grandfather’s brothers was killed on the Afghan border clearly doing the British Raj’s bidding against what Begg labels “Pushtun tribesman”. As this author understands the Begg family is originally from the Indian interior, so what made them travelto the borderlands with Afghanistan to confront “Pushtan tribesman” other than to be bag carriers for British white imperialists hunting “natives” who rejected the rule of the British Raj? The truth is Britain had impoverished India and reduced it to a state of penury and the Begg ‘family military tradition’, was literally as Indian enforcers and servants of British imperialist occupation. At about the same time Omar Mukhtar was resisting European imperialism, Begg’s family was serving European imperialism. When this paragraph is unpacked and we dig deeper into the Begg family “strong military tradition” it’s very difficult not to opine that Moazzam Begg is clearly a grandchild of Indian collaborating lickspittles of the nineteenth century British white supremacy. While other Indians resisted British Raj, the Begg “strong military tradition” was nothing short of serving the British Raj.
Begg’s and Dilly’s political family background dovetails neatly with an important observation made by Colonel Ghadhaffi in the month before his lynching by NATO’s foot soldiers. Of those that allied with NATO’s war on Libya, Ghadhaffi said:
“…their families back then where spies for Italy, and nowadays are spies for France and Britain the same sons are following in the footsteps of their fathers and grandfathers; the steps of dishonour…These rats and armed scum; are examples of their grandfathers. Each one of them is a clone and a mock-up of traitor-ship, they aren’t Libyan, ask about any of those that are backed by NATO; that destroys Libyan infrastructure and kills Libyan children; you’ll find that his grandfather and his dad where traitors. They carry the genes of traitors…”
After Ghadhaffi’s lynching, a once prosperous Libya descended into a nightmare with competing armed gangs. At one point in the 2010’s ISIS had established a foothold on the Libyan Mediterranean coast.
NATO’s War on Libya and the Germination of ISIS.
One could also argue the emergence of Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) was a consequence of the NATO Libyan regime change operation. As mentioned, one of the groups the ‘Libyan people’ set up was Kataib al-Muhajireen. According to Begg’s Zionist acquaintance Charles Lister, by the spring of 2013, Kataib al-Muhajireen merged with other jihadi groups such as “Kataib al-Khattab, Jaish Mohammed” and other “smaller Syrian jihadist cells to form Jaish al-Muhajireen wa’l Ansar” with the Chechen jihadi Omar al-Shishani becoming the leader of the merged group.
By November 2013, Shishani split from Jaish al-Muhajireen wa’l Ansar and formerly joined ISIS taking with him some of his acolytes or as Lister writes, “al-Shishani and his loyal supporters within Jaish al-Muhajireen wa’l Ansar would effectively become ISIS combatants.”
According to the Defence Editor of the London Times, Deborah Hayes, the notorious British ISIS head chopper Mohammed Emwazi aka ‘Jihadi John’ entered Syria in late 2012 or early 2013 and then specifically joined the original Kataiba al-Muhajireen “a 700-strong brigade of foreign fighters thought to have included up to 80 Britons.” The Daily Mail at the time claimed that he is believed to be “one of more than 700 foreign fighters in the Kataiba al-Muhajireen.”According to a Foreign Policy Magazine(FP) article Begg,
“…stayed with a group of British fighters who were part of the newly formed Jaish al-Muhajireen wal-Ansar, or “Army of Immigrants and Supporters.” Begg provided a group, mostly composed of Brits, with fitness training, teaching them jumping jacks, push-ups, and similar exercises…”
If we take the FP article as credible, then knowingly or unknowingly, Begg may have conducted training to future ISIS combatants some time in 2013. By late 2013 Jaish al-Muhajireen wa’l Ansar had largely dissolved into ISIS. It is in this context, that in February 2014 Begg was arrested by British police even though he had meetings with British intelligence, MI5, before he travelled to Syria between 2012-13. Obviously, for legal reasons, this author will not claim Begg must’ve met or even trained fighters who later joined ISIS.
It must be noted that Jaish al-Muhajireen wa’l Ansar wasn’t the only head chopping posse with Libyan roots fighting for regime change in Syria. According to historian and author Dr. Mark Curtis, post-Ghadhaffi Libya became a training a hub for 3000 Libyan and Tunisian fighters who then travelled on to Syria to join an al-Qaeda type group called Katibat al-Battar al-Libi. Lister describes this group as “Libyan ISIS faction”.
Not only had NATO’s regime change war on Libya led to the migration crisis, but it was foundational to the emergence of ISIS – once again, what it is an obvious truth to objectively minded people, needs to be concealed by those who wallow in propaganda.
False Rape Allegations Made; Real Rape Crimes Ignored
Begg also reveals himself to possess a tenuous relationship with the truth. For example, he claims no votes were held to implement a No Fly Zone in Libya, or to “bomb Libya” as he says. This is false. There were two votes, one in the United Nations which resulted in the UN resolution 1973 and another vote in the British parliament to implement the UN resolution. As a journalist, Dilly should’ve pushed back against Begg’s onerous claims but maybe because they share a common agenda, that is regime change, he allows Begg to get away with this claim.
Begg also makes the customary rape charges, a standard western imperialist propaganda point shared by their foot soldiers when manufacturing consent for regime change. Begg claims that “sisters being raped en masse” when speaking about Syria. Obviously, this is a very serious accusation and evidence should be provided. The same was said of Ghadhaffi’s Libya when the Western media was manufacturing consent for military intervention but with an added racist twist. The false claim was that Ghadhaffi’s Libyan forces were providing Viagra to African mercenaries to rape Libyan women. This turned out to be absolutely false. And if Dilly had respect for his profession he may have asked Begg about what evidence he had to support his claim of rapes “en masse”. Having said this there have been historical episodes of ‘en masse rape’ of Muslim women, specifically during the Bangladesh revolution when Pakistani military gangs raped Bengali women in their thousands. The Pakistani Army and their collaborators, the Razakars, actually set up ‘rape camps’. Some have stated that at least 200,000 Bengali women were raped by the Pakistani occupation forces and their Razakar collaborators. Or there is the contemporary ugly episode of grooming gangs raping girls “en masse” across some of Britain’s towns and cities. This leads to the question why do Begg and Dilly indulge in false claims about Africans and Arabs ‘raping sisters’ yet are quiet about the real and actual Pakistanis and Bengali Razakars raping women and girls in their hundreds of thousands?
On the other hand, Murray constantly regales his readers of acts of terrorism and sexual assaults allegedly committed by migrants and refugees supposedly as a result of Merkal’s immigration policy. Yet for some reason Murray seems to have no space or time to inform his readers of one of the most heinous and depraved acts of sexual terrorism of the 2010s. Namely, the British government invited hundreds of Libyans, who seem to have done British bidding against Colonel Ghadhaffi in 2011 to Britain for training in 2014. A small groups of these Libyan traitors (or “cadets” as the Guardian referred to them) left their Bassingbourn barracks to assault the local population and three were found guilty of raping a man. Indeed, since they had arrived in the summer of 2014, the police were forced to conduct, “frequent patrols around the Bassingbourn base as residents of the nearby village fear more “escapes” and “attacks.””
What unites the unholy trio of Dilly, Begg and Murray is that the former two indulge in false claims to manufacture consent for regime change. While Murray ignores one of the consequences of the Libyan regime change, the Bassingbourn sexual assaults in 2014.
Conclusion
“…speak the Truth even if it be against yourself.” Prophet Muhammad
In the Afterword of the paperback edition of his book, Murray boasts that no one can find fault with the facts in the book or “has even tried to contest or deny them.” The reason for this is simple. It is that many of the people who became his detractors, agreed or acquiesced to the NATO Libyan intervention. It’s because Murray and his detractors, such as 5 Pillars or Cage both had a dovetailed interest in overthrowing the Libyan state.
Ghadhaffi had argued that those Libyans who had joined NATO in the regime change operation, “are following in the footsteps of their fathers and grandfathers; the steps of dishonour…These rats and armed scum; are examples of their grandfathers.” Basically, the bloodline of today’s collaborators are decedents of yesteryear’s colonial collaborators. There is strong circumstantial evidence that Begg, by virtue his grandparents military served the multi-century British imperialist occupation of India, applies to him. Needless, to say that one can condemn Begg’s Guantanamo Bay incarceration and at the same time reject his de facto pro-NATO regime change blagging. In many respects Begg is the Muslim equivalent of American Jewish author Elie Wiesel. One can sympathise with the horrors Wiesel witnessed during the holocaust but at the same time reject his Zionism. Likewise with Begg, we can all condemn the suffering he endured in Guantanamo Bay but totally reject his Islamically coated regime change propaganda, blagging and untrue statements.
There seems to be a committed unspoken gentleman’s agreement to ‘memory hole’ the entire NATO war on Libya in 2011. It is on the basis of this memory-holing that Begg, Dilly and Murray, who seem to be surficial adversaries, can be actually seen as symbiotic allies working in tandem for common geo-political goals. All three then graduated to concealing the fact that the United States pummelled $1 billion to the regime change project in Syria known as Operation Timber Sycamore. Were they differ is that a neocon such as Murry launders imperialist intervention in the name of democracy and human rights; while the likes of Begg or Dilly would launder collaboration with western imperialism in the name of Islamic piety i.e “Islamic Revival”.
In 1953, Imperial Britain convinced the United States to overthrow Iranian leader Mohammad Mosaddegh in a coup, the consequences of which continue to be with us to this day with tense relations between the West and Iran. The consequences of this coup have included the violence of the Red Army Faction in West Germany, the Iranian Revolution in the 1970s and the Iran-Iraq war 1980s. In 2011, Britain and its allies convinced the United States to regime change In Libya. In the 14 years since, Libya became the springboard to launch a regime change into Syria; the revival of al-Qaeda; the emergence of ISIS; the intensification of Mediterranean migration crisis; the further spread of al-Qaeda across western Africa; enslavement of black Africans in Libya; killing of the American ambassador in Libya and terrorist acts across Europe, including the Manchester bombing at the Manchester Arena Ariana Grande concert in 2017. Whatever else comes out the ugly wash of the Libyan regime change, one thing is biblically guaranteed: 5 Pillars, Cage UK and the Zionist Douglas Murray will unite in concealing the truth that it has its roots in the NATO war on Libya in 2011.
While writing this essay, I realised the issue of collusion in the so-called “British Muslim” community runs deeper than certain elements within this community colluding with western imperialist regime change in Libya. Actually, we need to ask whether British Muslim’s have become the New Zionists? Anyway please click here to support my work. Thank you in advance.
Nu’man Abd al-Wahid is the author of “Debunking the Myth of America’s Poodle” which conclusively shows that British militaristic foreign policy in the so-called ‘War on Terror’ is rooted in the history of British imperialism and not because of commonly analysed and excused as any subservience or kowtowing to United States foreign policy. His X account is @NumanAbdalWahid
Professor Gerald Horne, author of White Supremacy Confronted has called Debunking the Myth of America’s Poodle an “illuminating, scalding and scorching takedown of British imperialism.”
Dr. John Newsinger, author of the The Blood Never Dried has said, “everyone concerned with the history of and the fight against British Imperialism needs to read. Both scholarly and politically committed.”
Churchill's Colonial Karma 