Is There a Case for “British Muslim” Moazzam Begg to be Considered a Satanic Spawn of British Colonial Bootlickers?

Churchill's KarmaLeave a comment

 “Nay, We hurl the Truth Against falsehood, and it knocks Out its brain, and behold, Falsehood doth perish! Ah woe be to you For the (false) things Ye ascribe (to Us).” Qur’an 21:18

Revolutionary Colonel Ghadhaffi vs Scion of Colonial Bootlicking Collaborators, Moazzam Begg

Many so-called “British Muslims” jumped on board with the British government in its regime change operations in Libya and Syria in the 2010s. Obviously, the vast majority were keyboard warriors but a trickle travelled to these destinations to actively participate in these western led operations. Among those who travelled was British-Pakistani political idol, former Guantanamo Bay detainee and Cage International director, Moazzam Begg. What distinguishes Begg from a being mere foot soldier and fodder for the Jeffrey Epstein compromised British elite is that he is clearly also spawned from a family of colonial bootlickers. This can be assumed with confidence from his autobiography with this revealing passage:

“our ancestors had been officers in the British Indian Army. Between them, my grandfather and his father and grandfather had seen action in the Indian Mutiny (though I don’t know on which side), the Boer War, and two World Wars one of my father’s uncles…was killed fighting bandits near the Afghan border. We had a very strong military tradition as a family, and I was inspired by it.”

Unpacking this heroic sounding passage requires brutal honesty but it is only within this historical context of his family’s so-called “very strong military tradition”, that is, servitude to the “British Indian Army”, that we can fundamentally obtain a more rounded and truer understanding of Moazzam Begg’s politics. Firstly, as he says, Continue reading →

Lawrence of Arabia or Lawrence the Swindler of Arabia?

Churchill's KarmaLeave a comment

Exposing One of the Greatest Imperialist Myths of All Time

One of the greatest untold geopolitical stories of the modern era is how a former settler-colony that developed into a hegemonic superpower saved its former Imperial master from existential geopolitical disasters. How the United States provided salvation for Britain in two world wars and then inherited and maintained its former master’s imperialist global interests, especially in the Arabic-speaking region of west Asia aka “Middle East” during the twentieth century is a phenomenal story in itself. Alongside this secular salvation, the United States maintained the foundational geopolitical mythology about the British presence in the Arabic speaking world. This particular mythology is based around the imperial agent T. E. Lawrence (aka “Lawrence of Arabia”). He is considered to have led the Arabs to freedom from Ottoman Rule in the “Arab Revolt” during World War One. Lawrence chronicled his adventures in his classic book, The Seven Pillars of Wisdom.

Steve Bannon the former advisor to President Donald Trump, is the latest to fall gullibly for this foundational mythology in an interview with world-renowned journalist Tucker Carlson. Bannon is an advocate of “America First”, a strategy which calls for the prioritisation of United States interests instead of forever foreign wars which are considered to mostly serve foreign governments. He recently drew an analogy of his interpretation of “America First” priorities with the “Arab Revolt” campaign during World War One. He told Carlson,

“I said to quote T E Lawrence from the Seven Pillars of Wisdom what they told him at the time when he showed up at Cairo’s military headquarters. They said, “Look, the Middle East is a sideshow to the main event, the Western Front”. And the Arab revolt is a sideshow to a sideshow. And I said, “The Middle East right now for us with everything geopolitically going on and the economic war with China…The Middle East is a sideshow and the Israel issue is a sideshow to a sideshow.”

To read more click here.

Funding for Proposed Essay: Are “British Muslims” the New Zionists?

Churchill's KarmaLeave a comment
I’m an independent researcher. My articles have appeared on Mondoweiss and al-Mayadeen English. I specialise in how Britain has maintained its interests in the Middle East. I have shown how most of today’s conflicts in the region are rooted in British imperialist foreign policy.
However, a new development or dynamic has appeared that no one is talking about. When the British elite led the calls for regime in Libya in 2011 and then in Syria – with the so-called “British Muslims” generally on board and a minority travelled to de facto assist the British state in its regime state policies. Moazzam Begg met with Mi5 before travelling to Syria. When the Assad government was overthrown, some of these British Muslims referred to it as a “Blessed Revolution”. Yet within a year, the new Syrian leader was shaking hands with Zionist leaders in New York.
So who are the these “British Muslims”? This proposed essay aims to answer this question. I will aim to uncover the political dynamics behind characters and groups like Moazzam Begg, Dilly Hussain, 5Pillars, MAB, etc etc

I’m aiming to raise about £2000 this should cover a period of 2 months which will allow me to focus on this historical essay.  If you want to donate please click here:

Delusional Dilly: Exposing the Ignorance of a 5Pillars Editor

Churchill's KarmaLeave a comment

Does Dilly Hussain Qualify as a Journalist?

The Muslim community in Britain is awash with unabashed sectarians who clearly and alarmingly have never read a modern history book. They seem to find morality and truth much easier to embrace by supposedly imitating the appearance of the Prophet Muhammad by flaunting a beard, clipping their moustaches and parading their trousers to their ankles as though this was the be all and end all of the Arabian Prophet’s existence. Listening to some of these Muslim sectarians you’d be mistaken to think the Prophet never uttered the word “Read” let alone it being the first word of divinely inspired revelation. This came to mind when this blogger read one of Mr. Dilly Hussain’s latest rhapsodies on social media. As co-editor of the “British Muslim” news website 5 Pillars, he fancifully claimed that “despite all my scathing criticisms of its rulers and regimes, that Pakistan, Türkiye, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt can reshape the future of the Muslim world under the right leadership and with the political will.”

I don’t recall Dilly ever making any geopolitical criticisms of these countries, scathing or otherwise, but let’s assume he has and leave it at that. However, I do recall he was a vociferous champion of the NATO lead regime change campaigns in the Arab world, specifically he was as keen as the Western-Zionist imperialist paedophile elite to see the overthrow of Bashar al-Assad’s Syrian government to be replaced by the de facto Zionist friendly government currently residing in Damascus. The United States pumped $1 billion into the regime change war on Syria in the 2010s to install al-Qaeda’s Jolani in power. Jolani is now celebrated by Western-Zionist leaders in New York i.e Ronald Lauder and has been welcomed with perfume by pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s top friend, President Donald Trump. Returning to Dilly’s notion that the leadership in the aforementioned countries “can reshape the future of the Muslim world”, this essay hopes to authoritatively show that this is nothing other than delusional and what follows is a brief historical understanding of each of the mentioned country’s relationship to the Western-Zionist imperialist pedophile global elite. Ultimately, the essay hopes to disabuse Dilly of his ignorance. Continue reading →

Why Britain Needs A New Non-Eurocentric Anti-War Movement

Churchill's KarmaLeave a comment

John Rees: Unmasking the Anti-Americanism of a British “Revolutionary Socialist”

One would be entirely forgiven for not being familiar with British left-wing fringe politics and understandably never have heard of a certain Mr. John Rees, a self-anointed “Revolutionary Socialist”, academic and importantly a co-founder of the British anti-war movement, “Stop-the-War Coalition” (StWC). There is every noble reason to be blissfully ignorant of him but unfortunately circumstance compels us to mildly scratch the surface of his posturing as a professed anti-imperialist. The Coalition he co-founded original purpose was to oppose United States and British wars on the Arab and the Muslim world during the War on Terror. This Coalition took the lead in organising anti-war demonstrations over the last two decades and recently is central to organising the anti-genocide demonstrations in support of Palestinians in Gaza. Unfortunately, the latter demonstrations have proven to be completely ineffective in terms of influencing government policy but admittedly they have allowed hundreds of the thousands of people in Britain to vent their disapproval of the Gaza genocide. In the following I highlight three pillars of posturing by Rees and his “Revolutionary Socialist” ilk which exemplifies the utter poverty of British anti-imperialism in the hope a consequential anti-war organisation eventually emerges to effectively challenge American-British warmongering. 

Firstly, central to British alleged anti-imperialism, as exemplified by Rees, is a simple anti-Americanism rooted in historical illiteracy and eurocentrism. Whereas most of the world would rightly denounce the Americans for their imperialism, for a good proportion of Britons, whether left-wing or right-wing, it is denounced for not supporting the British establishment and its military. For example, Rees is right to argue that the so-called “special relationship” between Britain and the United States is “little understood” but totally wrong to say that “the US had been a reluctant – and late-arriving – ally in the two world wars of the 20th century.” This comment is not only ahistoricism, but also plain British propaganda. The fact is Britain and the United States were not close allies before World War One or before World War Two. Indeed, before the latter war, the relationship had been strained because Britain had defaulted on its World War One debts after the United States had financially and militarily bailed out them out in that war.

Continue reading →